Whoops, I seem to have sent this to Stephen rather than to the list - anyway, the other day I posted some stuff to [[Wikipedia:Press coverage]], the Sun Media papers have made relatively frequent mention of Wikipedia in 2004 and already a few times this year. Adam Bishop >From: Stephen Forrest <stephen.forrest(a)gmail.com> >Reply-To: Stephen Forrest <stephen.forrest(a)gmail.com>,English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org> >To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org> >Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Article on Wikipedia in the Saturday National Post >Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:59:38 -0500 > >On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:39:56 +0600, Arno M <redgum46(a)lycos.com> wrote: > > I don't know if it is the same as this one, but you can read this without > > a subscription: > > > > http://www.thetyee.ca/MediaCheck/current/JourFutureWikipedia.htm > >Er, that's not the same: that one's four months old, and it's not from >Canwest Global. > >I must say I'm somewhat surprised at the relative lack of coverage >Wikipedia has gotten in Canadian media. However, it's cited regularly >as source material by CBC (Canada's national news service) online >edition, and seems to have gotten some isolated mention in >Radio-Canada (CBC's French-language equivalent). I would guess that >the other major papers will feel compelled to say something now that >the Post has featured it fairly prominently. > >Steve >_______________________________________________ >WikiEN-l mailing list >WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l