Ed Poor wrote: (like That's what I voted for, and indeed, that was the overwhelming consensus of the VFD vote, and is what has been done. And indeed, that could have been boldly done by someone without needing a VFD vote. But I would say that (a) there would have been a guaranteed edit war following it; and (b) there WAS a definite minority opinion that these people didn't deserve to be in the Wikipedia AT ALL, being merely "game show contestants". Me, I see the whole affair as further proof that VFD is not at all broken, and continues to excellently serve the community. Cheers! David... _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ This email and its attachments are for the sole use of the addressee and may contain information which is confidential and/or legally privileged. This email and its attachments are subject to copyright and should not be partly or wholly reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Any unauthorised use of disclosure of this email or its attachments is prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by return email.