Nothing absurd about it, deleting someone's contributions DOES send the signal that
that particular contribution is considered valueless by the deleting authority (speedying
admin or supermajority of AfD folks).
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:06:02 -0700
From: Philip Welch
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Cruft
To: English Wikipedia
Message-ID: <35E13D1F-87CA-4B4C-85E9-37998974110A(a)philwelch.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
On May 2, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Kelly Martin wrote:
In my opinion calling content contributed in good
faith by our valued
contributors "cruft" is incivil. It sends the clear message that
their contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless.
Reductio ad absurdum time:
"In my opinion, nominating content contributed by our valued
contributors is incivil. It sends the clear message that their
contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless."
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.