Should Sysops be held to the rule of law? Should Sysops be required to respect due
process? Should they be required to understand the burden of proof, and agree with the
concept of "innocent until proven guilty?" Should sysops face administrative
discipline, when they break the rules governing their action?
For instance, should sysops face justice when they ban a user who hasn't been creating
clear and obvious vandalism; in a situation where consensus cannot be found for the
banning, where a quick poll has not been successful, where neither the arbitration
committee nor Jimbo Wales has supported the ban...should such sysops be admonished, or
should they feel free to continue with their vigilantism?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sysop_Accountability_Policy<http:…