geni - just because the CIA cite things less than a year old doesn't prove
that they update more regularly. Only if a sequence of events as follows
occours will we know that they update more regularly:
Event A happens.
CIA cite Event A in short period of time eg. a week or two.
Event B happens shortly afterwards.
CIA cite Event B again, shortly afterwards.
This will prove that EITHER they are using the live copy of Wikipedia OR
they update more regularly. Assuming they update at regular intervals , this
also determines the approximate frequency with which they update (eg Weekly,
Monthly, Quarterly, etc.)
Regards, Stwalkerster.
On 01/01/2008, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So if the once a year update came sometime after the insert of the
info in Wikipedia?
On Jan 1, 2008 2:42 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 26/12/2007, Nachman
<nachman.chayal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Some might find this interesting:
>
> Over the holidays, I spoke to an individual I know well and was told
that US
> intelligence agencies keep a local copy of
Wikipedia available for
employees
> who are isolated from the Internet for
security reasons. Apparently,
its
updated
once a year.
We know that isn't true. Mostly because CIA reports have cited stuff
that has been in wikipedia for less than a year (children of someone
of interest outside the US not a significant detail.)
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l