On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, George Herbert
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Charles
David Gerard wrote:
Argument intelligent enough, use of "notable" is off-base though since
for us notability is an attribute of topics.
He's describing WP for an external audience. Not his fault that we
have internal jargon which is not entirely aligned with outside
Actually, Charles was probably referring to these sentences:
"...the debate over which sources are notable..."
"...since there's consensus that the [New York] Times is a notable
Doctorow (the author of the article) should have said *reliable*
sources, not notable sources.
Ah, missed that. I sit corrected.
-george william herbert