On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:17:55 -0400, you wrote:
There has been no explanation as to how this alleged
consensus has taken
place. Its because there is no actual consensus on this. The only consensus
that exists is merely between the people on one side of the dispute. .
Alkivar has certainly abused his power on this occasion. I have tried to
find out how to contact Alkivar however Ive found it to be exceedingly
obscure to contact and reason with him. Can anyone help me in this regard.
Not unless you are going to give an undertaking to discuss all edits
on the Talk page and not simply wade in and revert war as you have
consistently done on this article. For what it's worth I actually
agree that the items to which you object should not be in the first
para, but edit-warring is absolutely not the way to go about it.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG