Justin Cormack wrote:
I dont find the featured article process very
interesting. There are
lots of articles that are of that quality
but I dont feel any real incentive to nominate. And quite a few of
the FAs are not very good. Articles that I
care about are getting better, much better and thats more important
to me. What are FAs for? What percentage
of articles do you expect to be FAs?
Seconded. There's lots of really good articles, but the actual FAC
process is a *stupid* amount of work to *expect* anyone to go through
in my direct experience. I don't see how it can scale as Raul expects
it to.
(This may be an interesting side-effect of the article rating feature:
seeing what articles are actually rated highly by the readers and
seeing if they can get just that little bit of polish.)
- d.
- d.