On 4/28/06, Ricky Reno <juice2122(a)hotmail.com> wrote: place. It's because there is no actual consensus on this. The only consensus that exists is merely between the people on one side of the dispute. . Alkivar has certainly misused his power on this occasion. It is very irresponsible that Alkivar would resort to blocking someone for a month without even bothering to discuss it with the individual. Does anyone know Alkivar's email address so that I may reason with him? _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l You were the only one editing the page to not include "King of Pop" and "Wacko Jacko". You hadn't given a reason for removing the names. Referring to "The Kingof Pop", the name has become (even to me as a Brit) synomonous to Jackson. Just as Presley is The King (of Rock and Roll). You can't say that Jackson's habits aren't exactly normal either. You made no attempt to compromise, just wanting both names removed. Alkivar's block is justified, you were disrupting Wikipedia. -- -Sceptre http://tintower.co.uk