On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, quiddity <pandiculation(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
...
elsewhere. Our rules generally don't say we
can't use information unless
it has *two* sources; and in this case it's obvious that the reason the
information is hard to find is that Neil Gaiman is trying to keep it quiet,
not that it isn't true.
Unless there's a [[Template:Notable_Wikipedian]] tag missing from the
article's talkpage,
I suspect you probably mean "Neil Gaiman's /fans are/ trying to keep
it quiet". Not neilhimself...!
quiddity.
No, I think he meant Neil.
Did you know there's not one single use of the term 'Scientology' on
neilgaiman.com or any subdomains? Given his family is Scientologist,
he was raised a Scientologist in a major bastion of Scientology,
married a Scientologist, and so on, and given that people have been
interested in all the foregoing for a long time, and also given that
he used to have comments on the website, and *also* given that he is
historically very responsive to random questions about just about
anything* - the utter silence must be deliberate. Which is as one
would expect.
* I know this from personal experience:
http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2004/09/from-mailbag-er-i-won-huck.asp
--
gwern