Their official non-offensive word is "bulk". Anybody have any influence on Yahoo's email?
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
To follow up on the success/lack thereof: In the week following this, no list message were marked for bulk. In the 2 weeks after that, messages have increasingly been placed in bulk again. Maybe there's someone who can talk with Yahoo about getting list messages into an OK list?
--- Cheney Shill halliburton_shill@yahoo.com wrote:
Their official non-offensive word is "bulk". Anybody have any influence on Yahoo's email?
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
On 29/12/2007, Cheney Shill halliburton_shill@yahoo.com wrote:
To follow up on the success/lack thereof: In the week following this, no list message were marked for bulk. In the 2 weeks after that, messages have increasingly been placed in bulk again. Maybe there's someone who can talk with Yahoo about getting list messages into an OK list?
It's just a defective spam filter. I suggest you try another email provider. My son recently switched to gmail because of issues with yahoo's spam recognition.
On 30/12/2007, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/12/2007, Cheney Shill halliburton_shill@yahoo.com wrote:
To follow up on the success/lack thereof: In the week following this, no list message were marked for bulk. In the 2 weeks after that, messages have increasingly been placed in bulk again. Maybe there's someone who can talk with Yahoo about getting list messages into an OK list?
It's just a defective spam filter. I suggest you try another email provider. My son recently switched to gmail because of issues with yahoo's spam recognition.
FWIW, gmail has in the past marked individual messages on lists - wikien-l or wikipedia-l, not sure which - as spam. It's usually noticeable through the *replies* getting through normally, mind you, and I haven't seen it in the last few months.
On 30/12/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, gmail has in the past marked individual messages on lists - wikien-l or wikipedia-l, not sure which - as spam. It's usually noticeable through the *replies* getting through normally, mind you, and I haven't seen it in the last few months.
It's particularly noticeable on some lists - e.g. wine-users, which is about running stuff under [[Wine (software)]], keeps getting detected as software spam.
It could be worse - a friend of a friend had the job of running the spam filter for Pfizer ... makers of V**gra.
- d.
On 30/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/12/2007, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, gmail has in the past marked individual messages on lists - wikien-l or wikipedia-l, not sure which - as spam. It's usually noticeable through the *replies* getting through normally, mind you, and I haven't seen it in the last few months.
It's particularly noticeable on some lists - e.g. wine-users, which is about running stuff under [[Wine (software)]], keeps getting detected as software spam.
Just mark the post as "not spam" and it'll adapt.