-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel R. Tobias [mailto:dan@tobias.name]
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 04:37 PM
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 2 Jul 2007 at 16:41:33 +0000, "Fred Bauder"
<fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to
Wikipedia Review.
Then why exactly did you recently remove a link to a Wikipedia diff
that in turn linked to Wikipedia Review, and endorse the 24-hour
block of the person who had posted that link, all the while saying
that this was justified only when a specific arbitration ruling had
been made on the specific site?
I misread the link. Made a mistake. Embarrassing, but needs to be said. Unless the link to
Wikipedia Review is pretty nasty, it doesn't violate the rule about linking to attack
sites. That said, I think there may be some problems with the edit. Actually I think it is
original research, a whole other matter. But certainly not a blockable offense.
Fred