Like me Mav represents no one other than himself. The obvious solution is
for the mediation committee as a whole to request mediation if the mediator
who has been working on the case requests it.
Fred
From: Daniel Mayer <maveric149(a)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:22:28 -0800 (PST)
To: wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Qualifications for referrals to arbitration.
Fred wrote:
If two disputants and their mediator request
arbitration, it
would be seriously considered.
The reason person versus community cases have been taken
is that those are the cases Jimbo has referred to us. We stand
ready to accept person versus person cases too though once
we get going.
So says you. Since when have you been the spokesperson for the AC?
You are free to vote to accept such cases, but I will not unless a majority of
the mediation committee votes to refer the case or if Jimbo refers it.
--mav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l