http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ScienoSitter Step 1: Naconkantari blocks the user indefinitely, claiming it is a "vandalism only" account. A quick look through the user's contributions shows that this is absolutely not the case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ScienoSitter Step 2: The user requests an unblock. Naconkantari responds by HIMSELF removing the unblock template. Step 3: The user requests an unblock. A user who the user was involved in a content dispute with (by the username of OmicronPersei8) REMOVES THE UNBLOCK REQUEST. Step 4: The users requests an unblock. Naconkantari AGAIN removes the unblock template himself. Step 5: An admin by the name of "Mr. Lefty" locks the user's talk page for "template abuse". Note that up to this point, all the user has done is put back a template wrongfully removed by (a) the blocking admin who was also involved in the dispute and (b) a non-admin user who not only was ALSO involved in the dispute, but has no right to remove the template. Result? Naconkantari's abuse of power successfully hidden, user completely deprived of their right to a fair and impartial look at the circumstances of Naconkantari's abusive indefinite block. This isn't the first time Naconkantari's acted like this, either. User Xvidme is blocked as a "sockpuppet of NoLongerScieno" even though NoLongerScieno's block is "indefinite" because Naconkantari thinks it violates the username standards. Isn't it great how admins get away with this all the time? You wonder why people think there's a cabal? THIS KIND OF SHIT IS WHY. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ScienoSitter Step 1: Naconkantari blocks the user indefinitely, claiming it is a "vandalism only" account. A quick look through the user's contributions shows that this is absolutely not the case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ScienoSitter Step 2: The user requests an unblock. Naconkantari responds by HIMSELF removing the unblock template. Step 3: The user requests an unblock. A user who the user was involved in a content dispute with (by the username of OmicronPersei8) REMOVES THE UNBLOCK REQUEST. Step 4: The users requests an unblock. Naconkantari AGAIN removes the unblock template himself. Step 5: An admin by the name of "Mr. Lefty" locks the user's talk page for "template abuse". Note that up to this point, all the user has done is put back a template wrongfully removed by (a) the blocking admin who was also involved in the dispute and (b) a non-admin user who not only was ALSO involved in the dispute, but has no right to remove the template. Result? Naconkantari's abuse of power successfully hidden, user completely deprived of their right to a fair and impartial look at the circumstances of Naconkantari's abusive indefinite block. This isn't the first time Naconkantari's acted like this, either. User Xvidme is blocked as a "sockpuppet of NoLongerScieno" even though NoLongerScieno's block is "indefinite" because Naconkantari thinks it violates the username standards. Isn't it great how admins get away with this all the time? You wonder why people think there's a cabal? THIS KIND OF SHIT IS WHY. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

On 04/10/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote: That's Enviroknot, on whom consensus is that he can just feck off.

On 04/10/06, Oskar Sigvardsson <oskarsigvardsson(a)gmail.com> wrote: In fact, his morphing email addresses were the reason new subscribers started moderated ...