Oh and one more thing. Our entire content on 7th Heaven is restricted to 4
articles. That includes the list of episode article, list of characters
article, the general article on 7th Heaven. There used to be many more.
Guess what happened to the character articles?
-
Oh an I have not managed to find where this mentioned discussion is at.
- White Cat
On Jan 30, 2008 4:24 PM, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well.
I am looking at the entry on "List of 7th Heaven Episodes". Author
mentions:
"What was that, code? What the hell is this show about? We can't stress
this enough, there are 29,601 words in this entry and not one of them gives
us the slightest clue as to why even one person felt the need to devote that
much thought to it. Sure, it ran for 11 years. But *The Simpsons* has been
on for 19 seasons and its
entry**<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_simpsons>is only
a fourth as long."
Now author omits the fact that individual Simpson's episodes have articles
on them and is actually longer. Now guess what I found! You guessed right
TTN:
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=And_Away_We_Go_%287th_Heaven%29&a…
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tit_for_Tat_%287th_Heaven%29&…
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Some_Break_Ups_and_Some_Get_Toget…
etc... etc.. (more examples exist for the same show, I do not care to list
any more)
Over the time article was barred from any info regarding the plot
(content) of the show as visible in the current version unlike the old
version:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_7th_Heaven_episodes&o…
<sarcasm>
The second we have people on the internet that complains about the
extensive coverage on a topic we should race to remove as much info as
possible rather than expand other similar articles. Imagine extensive
coverage on fiction related topics! Surely thats not something we want.
I would also recommend "a court order forbidding anyone from adding to,
and thereby further ruining, the Star Wars franchise".
</sarcasm>
- White Cat
On Jan 30, 2008 9:38 AM, michael west <michawest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The Top #8 Most Needlessly Detailed Wikipedia
Entries - A tongue in
cheek
observation.
http://www.cracked.com/article_14981_8-most-needlessly-detailed-wikipedia-e…
Well I thought it was quite funny.
Mike33
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l