Cheney Shill wrote:
Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
charles matthews wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, Wikipedia decisions
should not be taken on the
basis that someone might be offended.
As far as I'm concerned, WP:NPA, WP:Wikiquette and WikiLove
are the best and most important guidelines Wikipedia has.
All other things equal, I agree with Charles. I still have no idea what article you are
talking about,
but assuming the content is relevant to the article, meets
verifiability, and does
not give undue weight
to something, the only other question that remains is
whether it is
somehow presented with more bias
than the sources present it. The policies/guidelines
you mention are
not relevant to article content.
They are for dealing with others on Wiki, not how the
article is
written or presented.
I'd say, that at least WP:NPA would need to be rewritten to
reflect what you say. WP:NPA starts with
"Do not make personal attacks *anywhere* in Wikipedia."
Regarding the presentation of the source:
WP presents it equally anti-Islam biased as the original source.
My advice is remember this, archive it, and when you
are involved in another
article (or some other
aspect of the article in dispute) where WP:V, WP:NPOV,
and WP:NOR
favor your position, reference this
and make sure that the rules are applied
consistently.~~~~Pro-Lick
Apropos rules, which are applied consistently. Please compare
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pa…
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArc…
--
Raphael