Yes, a great comic. I posted it too, only linked to:
I suppose there's an issue with archiving copyrighted
comics. Except for the Web-only comics that typically
archive all theirs, the prints like Get Fuzzy and Non
Sequitur only archive about a month worth. A problem for
the sort of collection Earle Martin suggested.
--- Avi <avi.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Get Fuzzy: April 20, 2007
----
en:User:Avraham
----
pub 1024D/785EA229 3/6/2007 Avi (Wikipedia-related)
<aviwiki(a)gmail.com>
Primary key fingerprint: D233 20E7 0697 C3BC 4445
7D45 CBA0 3F46 785E
A229
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Cheney Shill
<halliburton_shill(a)yahoo.com>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] We're famous!
--- Earle Martin <wikipedia(a)downlode.org> wrote:
> On 16/02/07, the wub <thewub.wiki(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
> > Meanwhile in good
comics{{POV-statement}}, Cat and
Girl
> had a typically
> > philosophical strip featuring wp the other day.
>
> Is there any page in the Wikipedia: namespace where
we
links to
webcomics featuring WP are collected? If so, shall we
start one?
In case someone did, another on WP's legendary accuracy
and
> NPOV:
>
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2007/04/29/
>
> For those of you in need of retribution:
> [[Non Sequitur (comic strip)]]
> [[Wiley Miller]]
(Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around