On 5/3/06, Gallagher Mark George <m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
I would make a distinction between "gems"
and "articles that should not be deleted". Good
articles are rarely put on AfD (an exception is
which I started myself and wholly acknowledge received a *lot* of effort; but which is
I'd personally disagree, and have so voted. I feel this is a case
where 'Wiki is not paper' applies: it would never be a paper
encyclopedia article because it could never be up to date.
At worst, it should be transwikied to a more suitable project, but the
fact is, the interest in maintaining it is here, not elsewhere.