On 5/22/06, Prasad J <prasad59(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Methylphosphonyl difluoride onto a pipe that the
wanted to cheack or the like
And you think that the Iraqis would allow that? They wouldn't be
(heavily) guarding the areas that the U.N Inspectors wanted to check?
Heh!, you don't know much about security-systems do you?
I Know a fair bit. Use a spayt and you could probably contaminate
everything in the room within a few seconds. You could hide then can
in your cloths.
Soldiers would be willing to cut the wires and kill their own
colleagues? Anyway the pilot would probably do a pre-flight check so
it wouldn't work.
So the US goverment can kill ~3000 but not one.
B-52s are bombers- fighters are used as patrol-craft
not bombers, how would the U.S explain why they were using a bomber to
patrol the no-fly-zone?
Able to spend a longer time in the ear. A more stable observing
platform. Reasons could be found. Far less effort than your proposed
9/11 conspirocy hypothsis