Daniel Mayer wrote:
Do we still need to be so oriented toward editing when we already have well over 4,000 edits a day and nearly 200,000 articles? A slow-down in editing and increased emphasis on getting things in stable form should become more of a priority. IMO, the best way to market that - both internally and externally
- is by using nupedia.org to host the stable content.
I agree with everything mav said here. I just *HATE* the name Nupedia. It's the "nu" for "new", and also the fact that "new" won't really mean much in, say, 20 years' time.