You may want to take a look at the Guardian blog post: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/aug/17/wikipedia-three- million
and also a couple by the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6042931/Wikipedia- reaches-three-million-articles.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most- viewed-Wikipedia-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html
and one by ReadWriteWeb: http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise/2009/08/wikipedia-passes-the-3- million-article-mark.php
All of them are better reads than the article in the Christian Science {{citation needed}} Monitor.
Mike
On 17 Aug 2009, at 21:17, Keith Old wrote:
Folks, Sorry if this is a duplicate thread but I haven't seen anything about reaching this milestone.
The Christian Science Monitor reports/
http://features.csmonitor.com/innovation/2009/08/17/wikipedia-blows- past-3-million-english-articles/
"Wikipedia, the upstart social experiment that trusts the online mob to steward world knowledge, has hit a major milestone.
The English volume of the Web encyclopedia reached its 3 millionth article. That massive number of whos, whats, wheres, and whens culminated with a profile on Norwegian soap opera actress Beate Eriksenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beate_Eriksen. In the less than 24 hours since she marked the 3 millionth entry, more than 1,000 new articles have already flooded in."
It concludes with info about the disagreement between inclusionists and deletionists.
"Both see the other ruining Wikipedia, either by defeating the point of an open encyclopedia, or by expanding its “pages” until the site dies from irrelevance.
Which side do you come down on? More the merrier? Or quality over quantity? Let us know below, or join the conversation by following us on Twitterhttp://twitter.com/csmhorizonsblog ."
Regards
*Keith Old* _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l