On 2/3/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/4/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I don't consider it that precious.
There's a lot of time in the world.
No individual participant, in the greater scheme of things, is
particularly crucial to the project.
WP:CVU is however rather more than one person
Volunteers' enjoyment, however -- that's
precious.
So how about you stop trying to spoil the CVU's.
It's spoiling mine. And how exactly are the members of the CVU getting
their enjoyment? Is it by playing out paramilitary fantasies of
protecting the precious Wikipedia from hordes of barbarians? Because
that's what the name implies.
And to that
end we do need to continue to find ways to happily manage
the project.
More (and automatic) admins, I say.
hang aroung 3 mounths edit at a reasonable rate with a reasonable
spread and adminship pretty much is automatic.
When I say "automatic" I mean "automatic", not "pretty much
automatic".