Wik has been discussed and discussed ad nauseum.  His reversions of valid data and his deletion of valid article pages were clearly vandalism.  We wouldn't have put up with an anonymous user doing it, but just because Wik is a logged in user, we have to put up with his repeated vandalism?  Now that you've unblocked him, he's immediatley gone back to his previous behavior, causing several pages to have to be protected today.  This has gone far enough.  Jimbo, can we PLEASE ban Wik?
 
And now, can we disucss 168?  He keeps deleting other people's comments on [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/168]].  Can we do something about him besides just revoke his sysop rights?
 
RickK

Caroline Ford <caroline@secretlondon.me.uk> wrote:
Rick wrote:

> Could the person who unblocked Wik tell us why they did it?
>
> RickK
I have admitted it was me. I object to sysops banning logged in users
without discussion.

SEcretlondon


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online