On 11/3/05, Jack Lynch <jack.i.lynch(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I want to read and write an encyclopedia in a
professional atmosphere.
The procedure for selecting representitives of the project should not
allow children and their antics to become the basis of its decisions.
Open votes are unproductive in this case.
Jack (Sam Spade)
Opposed to closed votes? Or another process? I think that RfA has kept a
pretty high standard for admins, and this standard keeps us from having
admin power wars. You don't see a clamor for multiple de-sysoppings, do you?
I take that as a sign that RfA works. Also, if a child is able to show the
community sufficient maturity and worth, why shouldn't s/he be an admin, or
participate in the choosing process?
-- [[:en:User:Bratsche|Ben]]
--
Bratsche-It means "viola!"