On 6 Oct 2006, at 11:00, charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com wrote:
"Tony Jacobs" wrote
Why
doesn't ArbCom come down on admins who fail to respect
contributors? Why
isn't that a high priority?
Why don't we get the cases brought that mean we could do that? We
have a clear policy on civility. Some people do reckon that long
service gives them some rights in how they talk to others. They are
certainly wrong about that, and should note well that ArbCom
doesn't have binding precedents, and may well up the tariff of
punishment for shooting off your mouth. As far as I can see, this
causes a large outcry when it is proposed, but it may well happen.
I've been meaning to bring a case for some time,
but no one is ever uncivil to me!