On Nov 29, 2007 11:37 AM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:14 AM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Since then there has been an ever increasing tide of hysteria surrounding this 72 minute block, with multiple AN, wikien-l, and other threads, an RFC, posting of private e-mails, OFFICE removals of same, leaking of membership lists, and now an ArbCom case which appears to be rapidly reaching a conclusion.
A lot of what you call "hysteria" doesn't seem to be over the block so much as the mailing lists themsevles. The block is apparently what brought the email to light, and the email is what brought to light the mailing lists, which most of us knew nothing about until the email was made public.
Exactly. And so what?
While some may still think there is value in insisting that witnesses should be subpoenaed here to name names, I think it's time to call this House Committee on Un-Wikipedian Activities to a close.
I find it humorous how much hypocrisy there is in this whole incident. Telling people to assume good faith in response to an enormous assumption of bad faith; comparing the demand for answers about a group of investigators trying to uncover anyone who is now or ever has associated themselves with Wikipedia Review to McCarthyism...
You see, this is why I rarely respond to your e-mails, Anthony. The cyberstalking list was set up for Wikipedians who have been cyberstalked as a result of their Wikipedia activities. I'm not aware of any "group of investigators trying to uncover anyone who is now or ever has associated themselves with Wikipedia Review"; that's more hysteria.