On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:45:48 -0500, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
I guess I can't. Is the point you're arguing about that "Durova" merely discussed "the investigation" with five people, and not "the block"? Because if so, I don't see the difference. The mere fact that she discussed that twisted "investigation" with people is enough for us to ask for more information.
Which you have been given.
Durova discussed the information - and the result was that people agreed this was undoubtedly not a new user. This is now established as undisputed fact. It's also pretty clear that they were pitching for adminship. What was missing was (a) any evidence of wrongdoing and (b) and indication that Durova was intending to block.
What you need here is Hanlon's Razor.
Guy (JzG)