On 30/05/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/30/07, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I am saying that if we want to prohibit
linking to Wikipedia Review,
> we come out and say so directly and simply and clearly. Don't beat
> around the bush with vague talk of "attack sites" that someone can
> come back to later and twist around to play silly buggers with -
> because they can and will.
People will always wikilawyer any rule, but that
doesn't mean they
shouldn't be made. The remedy for wikilawyering is common sense, as
always. Moreover, rules should be as general as possible; Wikipedia
shouldn't have a policy about one specific item.
Indeed. So why are you advocating it do so?
I'm not advocating anything. A claim was made that it might be
beneficial to link to WR; I'm trying to see if that's true.