On 29/02/2008, Ian Woollard <ian.woollard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 29/02/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Giveing them another tool to forward their
campaign though
would make things harder.
What things are these?
It seems to me that:
a) the wikipedia is out of line with almost every other encyclopedia,
book, newspaper, and even references in the article, on Muhammad
I've seen encyclopedias refer to islam as Muhammadanism.
b) the current position clearly isn't consensus
(both within and
outside the wikipedia)
Close to consensus as you are going to get
--
geni