Tony Sidaway wrote:
the RFC because he didn't feel like putting up with it. I "rejected"
the RFC because it was clear it wasn't getting anywhere.
Well fair enough. But it can't have been Rick's fault if the RFC didn't
achieve the feedback you expected. That's why it's called a Request for
Comments--we put them out when we're stuck trying to resolve a problem by
ourselves and we think the matter would benefit from some fresh eyes
looking at it.
I know some people think of it as some kind of disciplinary thing, and if
you expected that then you would have been disappointed because it really
isn't like that at all.
Well yeah, I got comments. Comments that proved to me that the whole
system is corrupt. I was hoping that those comments would persuade RickK
to rethink his actions, but I can be rather naive at times.
So if I did want to attempt to get RickK to stop, what would I do? File
an RFAr and hope ArbCom is impartial enough to accept?