Peter Mackay wrote:
From:
wikien-l-bounces(a)Wikipedia.org
[mailto:wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org] On Behalf Of Leif Knutsen
Being an admin is a big deal whether we want it to or not,
because admins have it in their power to do really really
annoying things to editors. Aside from 24-hour blocks,
locking articles in various ways, closing discussions on
AFDs, CFDs, etc., they also seem to enjoy a certain level of
immunity against complaints. There is, as far as I can tell,
a presumption that anyone who complains about an admin is a
bit of a narcissist or troublemaker. There are also constant
allegations that some admins are softer on people whose POV
align with theirs, etc.
There are some admins who shouldn't be. They got there because they are good
editors, not because they are good at being admins.
Some get it because they are better at political games, not because they
are good editors.
When an admin uses his
powers to win edit wars and harass those with whom he disagrees, it's time
to reassess that editor's role in the project.
Having said that, one must also consider the question - what is the highest
priority? Building an encyclopaedia or having a good working community of
editors?
Of course, building an encyclopedia has first priority, but a good
working community of editors is essential to accomplishing that goal.
Ec