24.168.92.117 is continuing to edit articles concerning surrealism in a way which in many cases removes valuable information without being able to offer what is in my opinion legitimate justification, arguably based on little more than his own axe-grinding.  I suspect he is not being serious, as seen by his most recent comments in Talk:Surrealism about Bush being a surrealist, but even if this (as I suspect it might be) is a joke, he isn't offering any support for or explanation of some of his positions, but is maintaining he should edit the articles on this basis.

Daniel C. Boyer