On 7/26/07, Steven Walling <steven.walling(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You seem to be missing the point. I don't have to
like or applaud something
to support it's right to exist. You can mock something and not be trying to
disenfranchise it.
Certes, but mocking something on untenable grounds, is counterproductive
to the intention of the mocker.
So far the mocking has been based on content clearly not added by the people
hosting the site, or central in its operation, but rather more its
vandals. There
really is a clear analogue here on people mocking wikipedia for being
"editable"
here.
"Wikipedia is unsecure!" - Yes, anybody can edit it.
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]