And who then is going to publish an actual peer-reviewed encyclopedia
for the purposes where this is the appropriate source? Citizendium.
That's whom they should merge with. It is much closer to their
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/14/08, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
Britannica may be theoretically higher quality,
but is not right there
on everyone's desktop - it fails on practical availability. Most of
Wikipedia's readers - the people who make it #8 or #9 site in the
world - wouldn't have opened a paper encyclopedia since high school.
Lately I've been buying a couple of oldish specialist encyclopaedias
from op shops, thinking I could add the information to Wikipedia.
Instead, it seems like often Wikipedia, the ultimate generalist
encyclopaedia, has greater depth than even the specialist
I think it'd be a bad thing for Britannica
and Brockhaus to go bust.
I'm not sure how to save their business though.
Release all the content under CC-SA. Merge with Wikipedia. Reinvent as
a publisher of existing encyclopaedic content, not a content provider.
Publish beautiful leather bound "Britannica Wikipedias".
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.