On 02/07/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, it was appropriate. The MONGO case was quite
clear when we voted
on it, and the vote was unanimous:
"A website that engages in the practice of publishing private
information concerning the identities of Wikipedia participants will
be regarded as an attack site whose pages should not be linked to from
Wikipedia pages under any circumstances."
OK, so we not cannot link to the New York Times, after its recent
magazine article.
I wish people would stop these hyperbolic slippery slopes. The NYT has
not "outed" any Wikipedia editor.