On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:01:21 +0800, "John Lee" <johnleemk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Look, it's very obvious to all of us on the list
that WR isn't a reliable
source. What we're saying is that it isn't to others, and that threatening
them with blocking isn't any greater an idea than threatening someone who
cites Joe Bloggs' blog as a source with a block.
Unless, of course, they continue to press the issue. If someone posts
it and it's removed and we tell them why, fine. If they continue to
re-insert it then a warning is entirely appropriate, just as a warning
is appropriate if people keep inserting a blog as a source. We do
this all the time.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG