On 10/11/07, Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com wrote:
I'm usually a big fan of Slate, but this is disgraceful. Can someone more articulate and who is able to make the point better try and raise the issue in Slate's Fray, show them who Brandt is from our perspective?
Our article on [[Daniel Brandt]] would have been a good starting point were it not protected blank.
Good luck explaining this situation to Mr. Agger and his readers. I doubt anybody is articulate enough to make Wikipedia not sound unbelievably fucking stupid for being an easy tool in the hands of a notorious cyber-crackpot.
If somebody told me to put a positive spin on that I wouldn't know where to begin.
—C.W.