On 27/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Jeez, now it's an Enron situation? Fine, geni,
name the "moral system"
in which failing to read one of hundreds of e-mails sent to various
mailing lists is a "moral failure".
Collective responsibility. Popular among certain religious groups.
It has been argued that Asimov's first law of robotics is a useful
moral principle in which case the person would fail the through
inaction part.
Oh, so you think the AN/I process is broken, and
that's what RR was
referring to?
Read the comment. Consider the timing. It suggests a process no?
Whoops, weren't you the guy who in this very e-mail said "speculation
is pointless" and "we don't need any more hypotheticals"? Take your
own advice, please.
The time of that comment is not speculation. Neither is it's wording.
At the moment there would appear to be those who want to find out what
happened and those who don't. While you are free to join the latter
group actively attempting to oppose those trying to find out what
happened is unhelpful.
--
geni