On 2/8/06, Jay Converse <supermo0(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This sets a bad precedent. If someone decides
they don't like gay
people because they might edit gay articles to be pro-gay even with no
established history of even editing those articles, all they have to do is
point to "Well, we banned pedophiles for having an inborn POV too, didn't
we?" and then Process(tm)(r) will dictate that since it happened before, we
should let it happen again.
No-one has said that. Don't twist people's words. No-one is being
banned just for being a paedophile.
People are however not allowed to say that they are pedophiles on their
userpage, and presumably there is a ban to go with it if the Arbcom is
not just wanking.