On 10/24/05, Justin Cormack <justin(a)specialbusservice.com> wrote:
On 25 Oct 2005, at 01:35, Anthony DiPierro wrote:
Well, I think all web comics are notable, so I doubt my reasoning
is going
to change your mind.
I dont have an opinion either way. All I said was that it wasnt
immediately
apparent from the article to an outsider.
It's immediately apparent that it's a web comic (at least, it is after
clicking the links to confirm that it is one). For me, that's enough.
Ok if you cant do that why are all webcomics notable?
Because Wikipedia has no space requirements. We have plenty of room to
include all webcomics. To choose to include some, but not others, would
allow us to make a statement about what is worthwhile and what isn't. It
would violate NPOV. Further, the only people who are going to come across
the article are those who are specifically looking for it. Keeping the
article in the encyclopedia provides useful information to those people, and
doesn't hurt anyone else. If any webcomics are notable, then all webcomics
are notable.
If you cant convince me (a broadish inclusionist really, and very
open minded)
then no wonder you cant convince the people on afd.
I can't convince the people on afd at least in part because I'm not allowed
to make comments on afd.