At 06:09 PM 5/26/2003, you wrote:
I was going to start doing this
myself, but I figured it'd be better if people talked about it first, and
more effective if they knew about it.
Instead of blanking articles why not replace the article text with a
redirect to a boilerplate text with something along the lines of
"The content of this article is being disputed. It has been blanked
for the time being, though older version are still accessible through the
Page History. It may have been blanked because of blatantly false
information, or non-encyclopedic garbage. This article may be awaiting
[[votes for deletion]], or awaiting a sysop to delete it. Please use the
Talk Page to discuss this dispute if necessary, and check [[Votes for
Deletion]]"
I wouldn't recommend that exact text be used, but basically, my idea is
to redirect articles to a boilerplate text explaining what's going on
rather than just blanking them.
That way, Googlers and people who located the article in the index or
search function will know what's going on.
Sounds reasonable enough to me. I support such a policy.
-----
Dante Alighieri
dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain
their neutrality in times of great moral crisis."
-Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321