Anth?re wrote:
>Just for the record
>Since Royal We and I are not able to directly discuss
>using words, I proposed that we discuss uniquely
>through edition/reversion.
>Everything I agree with, I keep. Everything I don't
>agree with, I revert. Words are useless, and acts will
>speak by themselves. If anyone is interested in the
>topic, that might be different. But as long as it is
>only he and I, it is not worth and not good to spent
>useless time in fruitless discussions. This is an
>adaptation for our personality types. :-)
I don't think that this is a very helpful strategy.
You and RK aren't the only persons working on these pages;
it might be best if both of you stayed away for a while.
Certainly edit wars, alone, are not useful,
and there's a big difference between saying
that you're unable to discuss things with your opponent
and saying that you're no longer going to even try.
You know, Ed Poor could be a big help here.
I have been staying away from these articles on purpose for a full month. The gaia theory (biology) really need input. I can do that. I did nothing for a full month to avoid pb with RK. What did it changed ? Nothing. RK is going his way. And that is about it.Why should I wait and he not ? Why should I discuss alone and get empty replies ?
Yes, please, you may call Ed to help on this. I will trust him for helping to reach a good decision
ant