In a message dated 4/7/2008 11:49:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, snowspinner@gmail.com writes:
Which I'm not advocating. I'm saying that we need to understand that the relationship between a summary and a source is not 1:1, and that any summary is going to introduce material that is not from sources. Such information cannot simply be cut out of the process - it needs to be carefully engaged with. Sources are vital, but we cannot pretend that an article is simply a natural and obvious extension of its sources.>>
----------------- Sure, provided that the additional information is simple infererence, observation, deduction, with which a person "skilled in the art" would in general agree. We already cover this.
**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides. (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)