On 3 May 2010 20:14, Anthony wikiagk@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't see what why it is advantageous to not tell an anonymous editor that their change will only be visible once it has been approved. Some might even be glad that we're finally bringing in a peer review system for the more bothersome articles.
Phrasing it nicely is probably advantageous :-) Emphasising who it's visible to ("you and logged in editors" or "logged in editors") rather than who it isn't is probably a better way of presenting it. "The in-crowd can see your genius!"
- d.