On May 10, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Cheney Shill wrote:
Basically, it's an argument that you can apply
policy however the
current majority of an article sees fit.
My understanding is different. Editor's consensus cannot be used to
bypass policy
See:
"NPOV is one of Wikipedia's three content-guiding policy pages. The
other two are Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original
research. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of
material that is acceptable in the main namespace. Because the three
policies are complementary, they should not be interpreted in
isolation from one other, and editors should therefore try to
familiarize themselves with all three. The three policies are also
non-negotiable and cannot be superseded by any other guidelines or by
editors' consensus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV
I am missing something?
-- Jossi