On Feb 11, 2008 2:20 PM, Nathan
It isn't "misleading"
Maybe it isn't, but Ant stated pretty confidently that she knows it is
In this case, if the expense was from restricted funds, then I think
she's right that it was misleading, though less misleading than 2006,
when this expense was filed under "Other". I'd certainly ask Mona or
whoever it is that produced the financial statements why it's filed
under unrestricted funds. Maybe she or whoever can explain it, then
Ant wouldn't have to go saying that the financial statements she voted
to approve are misleading. Unless there are other parts she also
knows to be misleading..
"Misleading" because of the application of
hindsight is not on apar with