On 14 April 2013 12:24, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Mmm, I remember that mail and whom I suggested ...
I didn't see you in that thread ... who were you thinking of?
I'm still quite deletionist on BLPs because of
examples where our
"rules" are too easy to game. I'm certainly not an anti-stub
deletionist because that I see as destructive of future growth, and I
improve many stubs these days. If "passionate" means "nuance-free",
which is a fair cop much of the time, then I agree with you.
I favour James Forrester and Thomas Dalton's arguments here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org/msg01454.html
- that Wikipedia started as anything-goes, this was severely cut back
and we're now closer to a nuanced equilibrium.
- d.