On 16 May 2012 19:41, Gwern Branwen gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
And why haven't they taken those who generalise broadly from a single example with them?
Are you denying the general decline in editors, even as Internet usage continues to increase?
Are you perpetrating a "straw man" fallacy? I'll happily assert that I find fewer hoax articles than I used to (in fact none I think for a couple of years). One crafted to get past New Pages Patrol doesn't mean much.
Charles