From: Kamryn Matika [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 10:58 AM
To: 'English Wikipedia'
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Why did you endorse my block if this is the case? The block was enacted
solely on the ruling in the MONGO case and was applied to my reverting to a
version of a page that contained a reference to Wikipedia Review. If there
was no arbitration ruling that relates to Wikipedia Review, how is the
justification for my block valid? Why did you support it?
I didn't read the link right. In this case the link might be fine, although Wikipedia
Review is down right now. I don't support broad generalization of the MONGO case. Glad
we cleared that up. Maybe we can resolve this. Who is it that thinks someone can be
blocked for a link to Wikipedia Review based on the MONGO case?