Anthere wrote:
>But if you all tolerate that RK does whatever he plans to do, without any consideration to the only one working on these pages, and decide to call me a vandal because I just try to express my disappointement and despair of what should be and not be "discussion", and try to do whatever I can invent to make you all aware that RK behavior is perhaps wrong, then I will just blank my user page, and go away.
>
Forgive me for coming in to this discussion rather late. I've not been
following the list much recently.
Who is RK?
I'm terrible with names.tseee
Look at the article on [[Knowledge]], especially the talk page.
The only thing it reminds of is the debate a few months ago on
[[circumcision]] -- there was some intransigent who kept insisting that
any planned legislation against circumcision would be an affront to some
"holy" "god-given" tradition. I ended up concluding this was the sort of
person with whom rational debate is impossible.
it's not that guy is it?
Anthere -- plese don't leave the en: pedia!!!!
-- tarquin
Thanks Tarquin, but right now, I am terribly upset. I think I need holidays. But I'll try to avoid letting you eating your scalp :-))))